Spot'd(evelopment)

the girl effect

Warren Buffet’s NoVo foundation is working on changing the world. By donating $45 billion over the duration of 3 years to the Girl Effect. It’s worthwhile to sit around for a few minutes watching the embedded video and have a thought about this effort to equip women with some micro loan so they could buy a cow which would grow into a herd which will result in clean water for the village and produces domino effects of reduced HIV transmission and increased respect by the men, enough for them to invite members of the opposite sex to attend the often ‘all-men’ tribal councils.

I have been taught to be skeptic. And this shiny vision of Girl Effect produces no different effect on me other then.. skepticism.

And this is why I don’t think giving women cows in developing world would not work to change the world completely:

  • women in developing world are very much still dictated by religious, cultural and social norms which often includes an almost complete submission to the husband’s wishes and requests. What does this mean? It means if you give a cow to a woman and if she isn’t empowered enough to say NO to her husband, the cow will either be sold off to the market and the money used for gambling/drinking/start-up money to the man’s business which if it ends up failing brings the woman back to square one
  • Similarly, if the system works in such a way that the woman receives some micro loan to buy the cow, the money might not even reach the market before the man has access to it.
  • community based development that is gender bias towards women may in paper appear great but as all those theories of Gender in Development, Women and Development and most recently Gender Mainstreaming say, if you exclude men from participating in project design chances are the intended outcome will never materialize
  • If micro loan is the way to go, Grameen Bank will still be the all glorified catchword even as we speak today. and if in fact Grameen Bank micro-credit system should have worked, there will no need for Buffett to hand over his $45 billion for this purpose.

With that said, hats off to Nike Foundation and Warren Buffett for producing an impressive and catchy marketing tool to spread the word on women disadvantaged status in the developing world (but don’t we already know that?). Perhaps are a time where the world is in dire need of any change, any replicated version of past development efforts is welcomed.


the world today is being corrupted by people of wisdom

this came out from a conversation i had with S after our group meeting today. we were talking about the state of the world and how despite G8 being made up of 7 other countries, the US always seems to have it their way… well almost. The Iraq war happened, that’s one proof to it.

There are so many things worth blogging about today, at this very moment there are a number of ongoing development issues that i have been closely following, amongst others the rising food prices but more urgently the post-disaster situation in Myanmar at the moment.

The UN has for a while been under scrutiny of many critics in relation to the amount of ‘power’ it has to deliver aid relief, decisions making on the go-ahead with war and generally to effect change unto where it is needed most. This past week, I may perhaps agree with a few of them.

Aid-relief in the form of much needed food, medicine, and clean water are currently found ’stuck’ at the borders of Thailand and Myanmar. UN’s Sec-Gen, Ban-Ki Moon seem to be doing something but that something does not appear to be significant enough to change the minds of military junta in Myanmar. According to Seth Mydans writing for International Herald Tribune -

Secretary General Ban Ki Moon urged the authorities to let aid into the country “without hindrance” and said the effect of further delay could be “truly catastrophic.”

Somehow the action word ‘urging’ seem to reinforce further UN’s helpless state and weak institution power to override the military juntas. I seriously think at a time like this, international relations must take backseat if it is in the name of reaching out and the saving the lives of those who are directly affected by the cyclone.

Myanmar - under whose mercy?

On the flip side, one can only imagine the amount of money that will eventually go towards aid-relief, post-disaster rebuilding projects in Myanmar. To NGOs and to the country offices of multilateral agencies stationed in the country. Like Maldives, as I have heard a first hand account today, aid when it is restricted to the hands of few who reigns the most power in decision making and public policies are the most unlikely to reach the bottom few, the poor and those living in hard-core poverty.

Money at the hands of the few, often whose education are the reason they are in such position, risks carelessness and corruption. The World Bank was once critiqued for its grandiose expenditures on first class flights and other frills that come with the job description. It is even more sad to discover that this is not limited to one multilateral agency.

With all this knowledge, it is not hard to finally figure out why in 2008, seven years away from the deadline to the 8 MDGs, we still see Bono fighting against a cause that never seems to rid of itself – poverty.


About author

Asian. Female. Believes in a just and ethical social development. Coffee is her best friend

Search

Navigation

Categories:

Links:

Archives:

Feeds